Anes Ibrahimagic

Badge #23973, White Male

Police Officer at 109th Precinct since February 2022, active

Also served at 44th Precinct

Service started January 2017, made $114,000 last year, Tax #963076

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched

Lawsuit settlements:
$63,000 Watson, Miyoshi vs Ibrahimagic, Anes, et al., 2018 BCSC BCSC 032685/2018E
View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint

3 Allegations

1 Substantiated

1 Substantiated (Charges)

1 Unfounded

1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202200930, January 2022

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant:	Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
APU Case Status:	Pending
Penalty:	APU - Decision Pending

additional details

Complaint #202200930, January 2022
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched	Black Male, 40-44	Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force	Black Male, 40-44	Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force	Black Male, 40-44	Unfounded
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.

Lawsuits

Watson, Miyoshi vs Ibrahimagic, Anes, et al.
Case # 032685/2018E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 15, 2018, ended September 23, 2021
$63,000 Settlement