Complaint #200103838, May 2001

Incident: May 26, 2001
Received: May 29, 2001
Closed: April 29, 2002

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Esther Bacchi

Officer:	Durinick, John
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 37
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Durinick, John
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Durinick, John
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Durinick, John
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Durinick, John	Hispanic Female, 37	Discourtesy: Word	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Durinick, John	Hispanic Female, 37	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons	Exonerated
Durinick, John	Hispanic Female, 37	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Durinick, John	Hispanic Female, 37	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Durinick, John

NYPD Conclusion: Plead Guilty - DCT

Penalty: Vacation: 15 days

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.