Complaint #200104882, June 2001

Incident: June 28, 2001
Received: June 30, 2001
Closed: May 23, 2002

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 114th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Eric Battaglia, William Cahill, Michael Loria

Officer:	Corcoran, Patrick
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Corcoran, Patrick
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Corcoran, Patrick
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Corcoran, Patrick
Complainant:	Black Female, 65
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Corcoran, Patrick
Complainant:	Black Female, 21
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female, 21-24
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Corcoran, Patrick	Black Female, 21	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Corcoran, Patrick	Black Female, 21	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Unfounded
Corcoran, Patrick	Black Female, 21	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Corcoran, Patrick	Black Female, 65	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Corcoran, Patrick	Black Female, 21	Discourtesy: Word	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Female, 21-24	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.