Complaint #200107580, October 2001

Incident: October 8, 2001
Received: November 21, 2001
Closed: June 12, 2003

Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 84th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Daniel Debonis, David Martin, Kwun Tso

Officer:	Rushing, Samuel
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rushing, Samuel
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Rushing, Samuel
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Rushing, Samuel
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Rushing, Samuel
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Rushing, Samuel	Black Male, 23	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Rushing, Samuel	Black Male, 23	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Rushing, Samuel	Black Male, 23	Force: Physical force	Substantiated (Charges)
Rushing, Samuel	Black Male, 23	Force: Chokehold	Substantiated (Charges)
Rushing, Samuel	Black Male, 23	Discourtesy: Word	Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Rushing, Samuel

NYPD Conclusion: Not Guilty - DCT

Penalty: No penalty

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.