Complaint #200200674, January 2002

Incident: January 21, 2002
Received: January 31, 2002
Closed: June 11, 2002

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 90th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Andrew Rigel

Officer:	Klimkoski, James
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Klimkoski, James
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Klimkoski, James
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Klimkoski, James	Hispanic Male, 37	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Klimkoski, James		Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Klimkoski, James		Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.