Complaint #200206005, August 2002

Incident: August 3, 2002
Received: September 9, 2002
Closed: March 21, 2003


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 106th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Joseph Kopack, Byran Liverpool, James Osullivan
Officer: Wall, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Isaksen, David
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Wall, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Monchinski, Jason
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Officer: Monchinski, Jason
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Officer: Monchinski, Jason
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Officer: Schmalix, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Retired
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Wall, Michael Hispanic Female, 58 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Isaksen, David Hispanic Female, 58 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Wall, Michael Hispanic Female, 58 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Monchinski, Jason Hispanic Female, 58 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Monchinski, Jason Hispanic Female, 58 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Monchinski, Jason Hispanic Female, 58 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Schmalix, Michael Hispanic Female, 58 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Retired

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.