Complaint #200208666, December 2002

Incident: December 29, 2002
Received: December 30, 2002
Closed: November 14, 2003

Reason for contact: Report-noise/disturbance
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 108th Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Brian Neary

Officer:	Lee, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Lee, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lee, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Lee, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Lee, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 31
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Ethnicity
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Lee, Michael	Hispanic Male, 31	Force: Physical force	Substantiated (Charges)
Lee, Michael	Hispanic Male, 25	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Lee, Michael	Hispanic Male, 31	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Substantiated (Charges)
Lee, Michael	Hispanic Male, 31	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Unfounded
Lee, Michael	Hispanic Male, 31	Offensive Language: Ethnicity	Substantiated (Charges)
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 30-34	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.