Complaint #200305955, July 2003

Incident: July 26, 2003
Received: August 5, 2003
Closed: May 3, 2004


Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Arnao, Charles
Complainant: Female
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Arnao, Charles
Complainant: Black Female, 17
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Arnao, Charles
Complainant: Black Female, 17
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Arnao, Charles
Complainant: Black Female, 17
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Arnao, Charles
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Mcdermott, Michael
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mcdermott, Michael
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Mcdermott, Michael
Complainant: Black Female, 17
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Arnao, Charles Female Abuse of Authority: Other Exonerated
Arnao, Charles Black Female, 17 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Arnao, Charles Black Female, 17 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Arnao, Charles Black Female, 17 Abuse of Authority: Other Unsubstantiated
Arnao, Charles Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Mcdermott, Michael Force: Physical force Exonerated
Mcdermott, Michael Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Mcdermott, Michael Black Female, 17 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.