Complaint #200306953, September 2003

Incident: September 9, 2003
Received: September 10, 2003
Closed: June 30, 2004

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 23rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Walter Beatty

Officer:	Conway, Kenneth
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Conway, Kenneth
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Conway, Kenneth
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Viola, Stephen
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Fuchs, James
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Conway, Kenneth
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 35
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Conway, Kenneth
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Conway, Kenneth	Hispanic Male, 18	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Exonerated
Conway, Kenneth	Hispanic Male, 18	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Conway, Kenneth	Hispanic Male, 18	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unfounded
Viola, Stephen	Hispanic Male, 18	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Fuchs, James	Hispanic Male, 18	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Conway, Kenneth	Hispanic Female, 35	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Conway, Kenneth	Hispanic Male, 18	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 18-20	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.