Complaint #200309188, November 2003

Incident: November 18, 2003
Closed: July 30, 2004


Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 103rd Precinct Queens
Outcome: Moving violation summons issued

Witness Officers: Richard Gioconda, Joseph Guiliano
Officer: Matheis, Peter
Complainant: Black Female, 40
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Matheis, Peter
Complainant: Black Female, 40
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Matheis, Peter
Complainant: Black Female, 40
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Matheis, Peter Black Female, 40 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)
Matheis, Peter Black Female, 40 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Matheis, Peter Black Female, 40 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Matheis, Peter
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.