Complaint #200310023, December 2003

Incident: December 17, 2003
Received: December 18, 2003
Closed: September 16, 2004

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 81st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Droskoski, Bradley
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Droskoski, Bradley
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Muniz, Ferdinand
Complainant:	Black Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Muniz, Ferdinand
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Droskoski, Bradley
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Droskoski, Bradley	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Droskoski, Bradley	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Muniz, Ferdinand	Black Male	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Muniz, Ferdinand	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unfounded
Droskoski, Bradley	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.