Complaint #200400250, January 2004

Incident: January 4, 2004
Received: January 8, 2004
Closed: June 4, 2004

Reason for contact: Report of other crime
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 10th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Golembeski, Erik
Complainant:	American Indian Male, 48
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Golembeski, Erik
Complainant:	American Indian Male, 48
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Golembeski, Erik
Complainant:	American Indian Male, 48
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Han, Eileen
Complainant:	American Indian Male, 48
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Golembeski, Erik	American Indian Male, 48	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Golembeski, Erik	American Indian Male, 48	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Exonerated
Golembeski, Erik	American Indian Male, 48	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated
Han, Eileen	American Indian Male, 48	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.