Complaint #200400461, October 2003

Incident: October 9, 2003
Received: January 15, 2004
Closed: June 16, 2005

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 70th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: David Lombardi, Richard Monroy, Rafael Pagan, Neil Polis, Walter Roberts, Kevin Stumpf

Officer:	Lee, Timothy
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lee, Timothy
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lee, Timothy
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lee, Timothy
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Melidones, John
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Melidones, John
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Melidones, John
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Lee, Timothy	Black Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Lee, Timothy	Black Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Unsubstantiated
Lee, Timothy	Black Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Unsubstantiated
Lee, Timothy	Black Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched	Unsubstantiated
Melidones, John	Black Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Unsubstantiated
Melidones, John	Black Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Unsubstantiated
Melidones, John	Hispanic Male, 26	Abuse of Authority: Other	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.