Complaint #200402383, March 2004

Incident: March 10, 2004
Received: March 16, 2004
Closed: July 14, 2005


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 101st Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Michael Ali, Joseph Bahm, George Torres
Officer: Branigan, Brian
Complainant: Black Male, 28
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Brady, Richard
Complainant: Black Male, 28
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Instructions)
Officer: Brady, Richard
Complainant: Black Male, 28
Allegation: Force: Vehicle
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Brady, Richard
Complainant: Black Male, 28
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Female
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Female
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Branigan, Brian Black Male, 28 Force: Vehicle Unsubstantiated
Brady, Richard Black Male, 28 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Substantiated (Instructions)
Brady, Richard Black Male, 28 Force: Vehicle Unsubstantiated
Brady, Richard Black Male, 28 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Female Force: Physical force Alleged Victim Unavailable
Unknown Officer Black Female Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Unavailable
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Force: Physical force Alleged Victim Unavailable

Penalty

Brady, Richard
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.