Complaint #200410825, October 2004

Incident: October 27, 2004
Received: November 1, 2004
Closed: July 29, 2005

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 30th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Robert Abramson, Paul Donahue, Joseph Kenny, John Romano

Officer:	Colon, Juan
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 16
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Colon, Juan
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 16
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Colon, Juan
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 16
Allegation:	Force: Radio as club
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Colon, Juan
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Colon, Juan
Complainant:	Hispanic Female
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer:	Colon, Juan
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 16
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Colon, Juan
Complainant:	Hispanic Male
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Unavailable

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Colon, Juan	Hispanic Male, 16	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Colon, Juan	Hispanic Male, 16	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Unsubstantiated
Colon, Juan	Hispanic Male, 16	Force: Radio as club	Unsubstantiated
Colon, Juan		Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn	Exonerated
Colon, Juan	Hispanic Female	Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property	Alleged Victim Unavailable
Colon, Juan	Hispanic Male, 16	Offensive Language: Sexual orientation	Unsubstantiated
Colon, Juan	Hispanic Male	Force: Physical force	Alleged Victim Unavailable

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.