Complaint #200501338, February 2005

Incident: February 5, 2005
Received: February 7, 2005
Closed: August 11, 2005


Reason for contact: Report-noise/disturbance
Location: Residential building
In NYPD Midtown South Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Peck, William
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Peck, William
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Boppe, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Boppe, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Peck, William
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Boppe, Thomas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 24
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Peck, William Hispanic Male, 24 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Peck, William Hispanic Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Boppe, Thomas Hispanic Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Boppe, Thomas Hispanic Male, 24 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Peck, William Hispanic Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unfounded
Boppe, Thomas Hispanic Male, 24 Discourtesy: Action Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.