Complaint #200512140, October 2005

Incident: October 6, 2005
Received: October 8, 2005
Closed: April 3, 2006

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 5th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Janna Salisbury

Officer:	Rapiejko, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Rapiejko, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rapiejko, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Rapiejko, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Rapiejko, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Crimmins, Brian
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 22
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Rapiejko, Michael	Hispanic Male, 22	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Rapiejko, Michael	Hispanic Male, 22	Force: Chokehold	Unsubstantiated
Rapiejko, Michael	Hispanic Male, 22	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Rapiejko, Michael	Hispanic Male, 22	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Rapiejko, Michael	Hispanic Male, 22	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Crimmins, Brian	Hispanic Male, 22	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.