Complaint #200512278, October 2005

Incident: October 12, 2005
Closed: May 31, 2007


Reason for contact: C/V at PCT to obtain information
Location: Police building
In NYPD 94th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Scott Adamo, Jaime Arroyo, Krzysztof Cetnarski, Robert Youngs
Officer: Gross, David
Complainant: White Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cronin, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Petronis, Peter
Complainant: White Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Petronis, Peter
Complainant: White Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Foglia, Edward
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Holmes, Ronald
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Gross, David White Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Cronin, Michael White Male, 38 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Petronis, Peter White Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Charges)
Petronis, Peter White Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Foglia, Edward Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Holmes, Ronald Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated

Penalty

Petronis, Peter
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.