Complaint #200602533, February 2006

Incident: February 27, 2006
Received: February 28, 2006
Closed: June 14, 2006


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 19th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Eduardo Pena
Officer: Mcnerney, Christophe
Complainant: White Male, 34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mcnerney, Christophe
Complainant: White Male, 34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Mcnerney, Christophe
Complainant: White Male, 34
Allegation: Offensive Language: Religion
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Mcnerney, Christophe
Complainant: White Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Mcnerney, Christophe White Male, 34 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Mcnerney, Christophe White Male, 34 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Charges)
Mcnerney, Christophe White Male, 34 Offensive Language: Religion Unsubstantiated
Mcnerney, Christophe White Male, 34 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Mcnerney, Christophe
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.