Complaint #200605819, April 2006

Incident: April 13, 2006
Received: May 5, 2006
Closed: February 12, 2007


Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Frank Dantuono, Manolin Molina
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Harper, Lawrence
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Harper, Lawrence
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Harper, Lawrence
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Harper, Lawrence Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Harper, Lawrence Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Harper, Lawrence Black Male, 33 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Harper, Lawrence
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.