Complaint #200606636, April 2006

Incident: April 2, 2006
Received: May 22, 2006
Closed: January 12, 2007

Reason for contact: C/V requested investigation of crime
Location: Residential building
In NYPD 73rd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Weidner, Christophe
Complainant:	Male, 42
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Weidner, Christophe
Complainant:	Male, 42
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Downey, Phillip
Complainant:	Male, 42
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Downey, Phillip
Complainant:	Male, 42
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Weidner, Christophe
Complainant:	Male, 42
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Weidner, Christophe	Male, 42	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Weidner, Christophe	Male, 42	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Downey, Phillip	Male, 42	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Downey, Phillip	Male, 42	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Weidner, Christophe	Male, 42	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.