Complaint #200608560, June 2006

Incident: June 28, 2006
Received: June 29, 2006
Closed: December 19, 2007


Reason for contact: Report-possession/sale of narcotics
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 46th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Franklin Bohr, Jessica Meza, Ronald Smith, Christophe Watson
Officer: Korchnoy, Albert
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 46
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Officer: Federlein, Eric
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Federlein, Eric
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 45-49
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Korchnoy, Albert
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Officer: Owens, Kevin
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 14
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Korchnoy, Albert Hispanic Female, 46 Force: Physical force Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Federlein, Eric Hispanic Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Federlein, Eric Hispanic Male, 14 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Hispanic Female, 45-49 Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Korchnoy, Albert Hispanic Male, 14 Force: Chokehold Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
Owens, Kevin Hispanic Male, 14 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.