Complaint #200616192, November 2006

Incident: November 25, 2006
Received: December 5, 2006
Closed: February 15, 2008

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 43rd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Dominick Beauvoir, Joaquin Camacho, Kishon Hickman, Richard Johnson, Andrew Macelhinney

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 50-54
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 50-54
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 50-54
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Roman, Albert
Complainant:	Black Male, 53
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Woods, Thomas
Complainant:	Black Male, 53
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Roman, Albert
Complainant:	Black Male, 53
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Woods, Thomas
Complainant:	Black Male, 53
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 50-54	Force: Chokehold	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 50-54	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 50-54	Discourtesy: Word	Officer(s) Unidentified
Roman, Albert	Black Male, 53	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Woods, Thomas	Black Male, 53	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Roman, Albert	Black Male, 53	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated
Woods, Thomas	Black Male, 53	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.