Complaint #200705829, March 2007

Incident: March 30, 2007
Received: April 27, 2007
Closed: June 19, 2008


Documents:
Complaint Report
Dispostion Letter

Reason for contact: C/V intervened on behalf of/observed encounter w/3rd party
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD Midtown South Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - OGA

Witness Officers: David Kantor, Christoph Quirk, Kevin Stewart
Officer: Horohoe, Timothy
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Horohoe, Timothy
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Horohoe, Timothy
Complainant: White Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Horohoe, Timothy Hispanic Male, 54 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Charges)
Horohoe, Timothy Hispanic Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Unsubstantiated
Horohoe, Timothy White Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Exonerated

Penalty

Horohoe, Timothy
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.