Complaint #200706201, May 2007

Incident: May 2, 2007
Received: May 4, 2007
Closed: December 19, 2007

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 112th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: John Damico, James Mcnellis

Officer:	Lipton, Christophe
Complainant:	Asian Male, 23
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lipton, Christophe
Complainant:	Asian Male, 23
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Lipton, Christophe
Complainant:	Asian Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lipton, Christophe
Complainant:	Asian Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Lipton, Christophe
Complainant:	Asian Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Lipton, Christophe	Asian Male, 23	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Lipton, Christophe	Asian Male, 23	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Unfounded
Lipton, Christophe	Asian Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Lipton, Christophe	Asian Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Lipton, Christophe	Asian Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.