Complaint #200901726, January 2009

Incident: January 31, 2009
Received: February 4, 2009
Closed: December 11, 2009


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 88th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Barbee, Anthony
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Barbee, Anthony
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Barbee, Anthony
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Brust, Albert
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Brust, Albert
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Brust, Albert
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Barbee, Anthony
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Brust, Albert
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Barbee, Anthony Black Male Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Barbee, Anthony Black Male Offensive Language: Race Unsubstantiated
Barbee, Anthony Black Male Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Brust, Albert Black Male Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Brust, Albert Black Male Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Exonerated
Brust, Albert Black Male Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Barbee, Anthony Black Male Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unfounded
Brust, Albert Black Male Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.