Complaint #200907294, May 2009

Incident: May 11, 2009
Received: May 12, 2009
Closed: August 18, 2010

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Hugh Bogle, Terrence Delgado, David Johnson, Daniel Robbins

Officer:	Acker, Chris
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Villanueva, Jose
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Acker, Chris
Complainant:	Black Male, 23
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Acker, Chris
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 52
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Officer:	Acker, Chris
Complainant:	Black Female, 64
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	Not Guilty - DCT

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Acker, Chris	Black Male, 23	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Villanueva, Jose		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Substantiated (Charges)
Acker, Chris	Black Male, 23	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Exonerated
Acker, Chris	Hispanic Female, 52	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: Charges and Specifications - Guilty
Acker, Chris	Black Female, 64	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: Not Guilty - DCT

Penalty

Acker, Chris

Penalty: Vacation: 15 days

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.