Complaint #201107731, June 2011

Incident: June 9, 2011
Received: June 15, 2011
Closed: October 10, 2012


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 49th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Sean Lynch
Officer: Lozada, Carlos
Complainant: Black Female, 45
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lozada, Carlos
Complainant: Black Female, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Carbonell, Rolando
Complainant: Black Female, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Cunningham, Noelle
Complainant: Female, 19
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Cunningham, Noelle
Complainant: Black Female, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lozada, Carlos
Complainant: Black Female, 45
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Lozada, Carlos Black Female, 45 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Lozada, Carlos Black Female, 45 Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Unsubstantiated
Carbonell, Rolando Black Female, 45 Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Unsubstantiated
Cunningham, Noelle Female, 19 Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Cunningham, Noelle Black Female, 45 Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Unsubstantiated
Lozada, Carlos Black Female, 45 Force: Gun Pointed Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.