Complaint #201601434, January 2016

Incident: January 9, 2016
Received: February 22, 2016
Closed: June 1, 2016


Reason for contact: Execution of arrest/bench warrant
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 114th Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Cole Ferraro, James Mckenna
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Summa, Montgomery
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Summa, Montgomery
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Summa, Montgomery
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Cavanagh, Desmond
Complainant: Black Male, 49
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Female, 35-39
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Male, 45-49 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Summa, Montgomery Black Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Unfounded
Summa, Montgomery Black Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Unsubstantiated
Summa, Montgomery Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Cavanagh, Desmond Black Male, 49 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Female, 35-39 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated

Penalty

Summa, Montgomery
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.