Complaint #201602737, March 2016

Incident: March 25, 2016
Received: March 30, 2016
Closed: November 2, 2016


Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 45th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Martinez, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Martinez, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Martinez, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Martinez, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Martinez, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perez, Carlos
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Martinez, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Martinez, Luis
Complainant: Black Male, 42
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Martinez, Luis Black Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated
Martinez, Luis Black Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Martinez, Luis Black Male, 42 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Martinez, Luis Black Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Martinez, Luis Black Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Perez, Carlos Black Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated
Martinez, Luis Black Male, 42 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Martinez, Luis Black Male, 42 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.