Complaint #202300826, January 2023

Incident: January 28, 2023
Received: January 30, 2023
Closed: May 9, 2024

Updated: June 30, 2024


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 28th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Matthew Grieve, Shu Li, Tarik Sheppard
Officer: Matos, Randy
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Matos, Randy
Complainant: Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Zimonjic, Haris
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Green, Gregory
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Age 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: White Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Matos, Randy Black Male, 35-39 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Matos, Randy Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Zimonjic, Haris Black Male, 35-39 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Green, Gregory Black Male, 35-39 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Unknown Officer Age 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer White Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer Black Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Officer(s) Unidentified

Penalty

Matos, Randy
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.