Complaint #202301436, February 2023

Incident: February 9, 2023
Received: February 19, 2023
Closed: May 21, 2024

Updated: June 30, 2024


Reason for contact: C/V requested investigation of crime
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 113th Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Brussell, Christopher
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Brussell, Christopher
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Brussell, Christopher
Complainant: Female, 45-49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Brussell, Christopher
Complainant: Female, 45-49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Bullock, Mary
Complainant: Female, 45-49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Brussell, Christopher Black Female, 45-49 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unable to Determine
Brussell, Christopher Black Female, 45-49 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unable to Determine
Brussell, Christopher Female, 45-49 Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number Unable to Determine
Brussell, Christopher Female, 45-49 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Bullock, Mary Female, 45-49 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Command Discipline A)

Penalties

Bullock, Mary
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Brussell, Christopher
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.