Complaint #202303250, April 2023

Incident: April 3, 2023
Received: April 17, 2023
Closed: May 9, 2024

Reason for contact: Parking violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 32nd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime

Officer:	Pinnock, Kharl
Complainant:	Male, 55-59
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Graham, Derika
Complainant:	Male, 55-59
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Pinnock, Kharl
Complainant:	Male, 55-59
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine
Officer:	Graham, Derika
Complainant:	Male, 55-59
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Pinnock, Kharl	Male, 55-59	Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property	Within NYPD Guidelines
Graham, Derika	Male, 55-59	Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property	Within NYPD Guidelines
Pinnock, Kharl	Male, 55-59	Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera	Unable to Determine
Graham, Derika	Male, 55-59	Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera	Unable to Determine

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.