Complaint #8602703, July 1986

Incident: July 9, 1986

Reason for contact: Traffic Incidents/Accident/Prk Violation
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Scholl, Charles
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Weitzman, Hiram
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Scholl, Charles
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Weitzman, Hiram
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Scholl, Charles
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Weitzman, Hiram
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Scholl, Charles	Force: Beat	Substantiated (Charges)
Weitzman, Hiram	Force: Beat	Unsubstantiated
Scholl, Charles	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Weitzman, Hiram	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Scholl, Charles	Discourtesy: Nasty Words	Unsubstantiated
Weitzman, Hiram	Discourtesy: Nasty Words	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.