Complaint #8900682, March 1989

Incident: March 3, 1989

Reason for contact: Traffic Incidents/Accident/Prk Violation
Outcome: Disorderly-Conduct/Arr/Summons

Officer:	Bakal, Steven
Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bakal, Steven
Allegation:	Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bakal, Steven
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bakal, Steven
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bakal, Steven
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (No Recommendations)

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Bakal, Steven	Force: Push/Shove	Exonerated
Bakal, Steven	Force: Other - Force	Unsubstantiated
Bakal, Steven	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force	Unsubstantiated
Bakal, Steven	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Bakal, Steven	Discourtesy: Curse	Substantiated (No Recommendations)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.