Complaint #9100076, December 1990

Incident: December 25, 1990
Received: January 9, 1991
Closed: January 9, 1991

Reason for contact: Dispute
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Dimuro, Nicholas
Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Mcguire, Richard
Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Nonnenmann, Mark
Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Mccarthy, Kevin
Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dimuro, Nicholas
Allegation:	Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dimuro, Nicholas
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Mcguire, Richard
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Nonnenmann, Mark
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Mccarthy, Kevin
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dimuro, Nicholas
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dimuro, Nicholas
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Dimuro, Nicholas	Force: Push/Shove	Unsubstantiated
Mcguire, Richard	Force: Push/Shove	Unsubstantiated
Nonnenmann, Mark	Force: Push/Shove	Unsubstantiated
Mccarthy, Kevin	Force: Push/Shove	Unsubstantiated
Dimuro, Nicholas	Force: Other - Force	Unsubstantiated
Dimuro, Nicholas	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Mcguire, Richard	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Nonnenmann, Mark	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Mccarthy, Kevin	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Dimuro, Nicholas	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force	Unsubstantiated
Dimuro, Nicholas	Discourtesy: Curse	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.