Complaint #9605782, December 1996

Incident: December 25, 1996
Received: December 26, 1996
Closed: December 26, 1996

Reason for contact: Traffic Incidents/Accident/Prk Violation
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Bendig, Daniel
Allegation:	Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Walker, Matthew
Allegation:	Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Walker, Matthew
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bendig, Daniel
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bendig, Daniel
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Detention
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Walker, Matthew
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Detention
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bendig, Daniel
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Walker, Matthew
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Bendig, Daniel	Force: Gun pointed	Unsubstantiated
Walker, Matthew	Force: Gun pointed	Unsubstantiated
Walker, Matthew	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched	Exonerated
Bendig, Daniel	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle searched	Unsubstantiated
Bendig, Daniel	Abuse of Authority: Detention	Exonerated
Walker, Matthew	Abuse of Authority: Detention	Exonerated
Bendig, Daniel	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn	Exonerated
Walker, Matthew	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.