Complaint #9701702, May 1997

Incident: May 8, 1997
Received: May 13, 1997
Closed: May 13, 1997

Reason for contact: Patrol Encounter
Outcome: Obstruct-Govt-Admin/Arrested

Officer:	Rolon, David
Allegation:	Force: Dragged/Pulled
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Camacho, Louis
Allegation:	Force: Flashlight as club
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Camacho, Louis
Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rolon, David
Allegation:	Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Camacho, Louis
Allegation:	Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Camacho, Louis
Allegation:	Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rolon, David
Allegation:	Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rolon, David
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Rolon, David
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Camacho, Louis
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Rolon, David	Force: Dragged/Pulled	Exonerated
Camacho, Louis	Force: Flashlight as club	Substantiated (Charges)
Camacho, Louis	Force: Push/Shove	Unsubstantiated
Rolon, David	Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club	Substantiated (Charges)
Camacho, Louis	Force: Punch/Kick	Unsubstantiated
Camacho, Louis	Force: Other - Force	Unsubstantiated
Rolon, David	Force: Other - Force	Unsubstantiated
Rolon, David	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Rolon, David	Discourtesy: Curse	Unsubstantiated
Camacho, Louis	Discourtesy: Curse	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.