Complaint #9701931, June 1997

Incident: June 1, 1997
Received: June 3, 1997
Closed: June 3, 1997

Reason for contact: Dispute
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Fraser, John
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premise Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Lopes, John
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premise Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Fraser, John
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Fraser, John
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property Seized
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Fraser, John
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Fraser, John
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Fraser, John	Abuse of Authority: Premise Searched	Unfounded
Lopes, John	Abuse of Authority: Premise Searched	Unfounded
Fraser, John	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Fraser, John	Abuse of Authority: Property Seized	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Fraser, John	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Exonerated
Fraser, John	Discourtesy: Nasty Words	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.