Complaint #9704318, November 1997

Incident: November 13, 1997
Received: November 17, 1997
Closed: November 17, 1997

Reason for contact: Stop/Question/Frisk
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Dukes, Christophe
Allegation:	Force: Dragged/Pulled
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Mceleney, Eileen
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Mceleney, Eileen
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Degrazia, Thomas
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Dukes, Christophe
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Dukes, Christophe	Force: Dragged/Pulled	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Mceleney, Eileen	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Mceleney, Eileen	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Unsubstantiated
Degrazia, Thomas	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Unfounded
Dukes, Christophe	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.