Complaint #9800633, February 1998

Incident: February 6, 1998
Received: February 9, 1998
Closed: February 9, 1998

Reason for contact: Stop/Question/Frisk
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Schilling, Michael
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Coccia, Robert
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Valdivia, Gerard
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Schilling, Michael
Allegation:	Force: Mace
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Valdivia, Gerard
Allegation:	Force: Mace
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Valdivia, Gerard
Allegation:	Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Coccia, Robert
Allegation:	Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Valdivia, Gerard
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Schilling, Michael	Force: Beat	Unsubstantiated
Coccia, Robert	Force: Beat	Unsubstantiated
Valdivia, Gerard	Force: Beat	Unsubstantiated
Schilling, Michael	Force: Mace	Unsubstantiated
Valdivia, Gerard	Force: Mace	Unsubstantiated
Valdivia, Gerard	Force: Nightstick/Billy/Club	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Coccia, Robert	Force: Punch/Kick	Unfounded
Valdivia, Gerard	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.