Complaint #9804539, October 1998

Incident: October 20, 1998


Reason for contact: Arrest/Complainant
Outcome: Disorderly-Conduct/Arr/Summons
Officer: Golding, Garnett
Allegation: Force: Dragged/Pulled
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Briano, John
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Golding, Garnett
Allegation: Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Golding, Garnett
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Briano, John
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Golding, Garnett
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Briano, John
Allegation: Discourtesy: Nasty Words
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Golding, Garnett Force: Dragged/Pulled Unsubstantiated
Briano, John Force: Push/Shove Exonerated
Golding, Garnett Force: Punch/Kick Unfounded
Golding, Garnett Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Briano, John Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Unsubstantiated
Golding, Garnett Discourtesy: Nasty Words Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Briano, John Discourtesy: Nasty Words Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.