Complaint #9900812, February 1999

Incident: February 16, 1999
Received: February 19, 1999
Closed: April 6, 2000

Reason for contact: Other
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Dixon, Ivory
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Miller, Chantay
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bouillon, Guy
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bouillon, Guy
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bouillon, Guy
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Gun pointed/gun drawn
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bramble, Anthony
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Miller, Chantay
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Miller, Chantay
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Miller, Chantay
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Dixon, Ivory	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Miller, Chantay	Force: Beat	Unsubstantiated
Bouillon, Guy	Discourtesy: Curse	Unsubstantiated
Bouillon, Guy	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Bouillon, Guy	Abuse of Authority: Gun pointed/gun drawn	Exonerated
Bramble, Anthony	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Miller, Chantay	Discourtesy: Word	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Miller, Chantay	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Miller, Chantay	Force: Physical force	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.