Stephen Chmil

Badge #1806, White Male
Service started January 1971, Tax #865340

Lawsuit settlements:
$10,500,000   Williams, Shawn vs Scarcella, Louis, et al., 2020 EDNY EDNY 20CV02348
$5,900,000   Bunn, John vs City of New York, et al., 2019 EDNY EDNY 19CV04667
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #9701312, March 1997
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premise Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #8000265, February 1980
Allegation: Abuse of Authority
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #7902630, October 1979
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #7400784, April 1974
Allegation: Force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9701312, March 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premise Searched Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #8000265, February 1980
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #7902630, October 1979
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #7400784, April 1974
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $16,400,000 total settlements.

Irons, James vs Scarcella, Louis Et, Al
Case # 23CV07633, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 13, 2023

Williams, Shawn vs Scarcella, Louis, et al.
Case # 20CV02348, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 12, 2020, ended May 12, 2022
$10,500,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On July 13, 2018, Plaintiff’s 1994 conviction for murder was vacated, after he served 24 years in prison. The conviction was based on a single eye witness who later recanted her testimony and asserts that she testified falsely due to coercion by former NYPD detectives Louis Scarcella, Stephen Chmil, and Lewis Bond. NYPD officers came to the witness’s home, arrested and imprisoned her, and transported her from Georgia to New York to testify. The prosecutor, Assistant District Attorney Ogistem knew of this activity. Plaintiff filed a motion to vacate his conviction based on grounds of actual innocence, newly discovered evidence, and violation of First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, including Brady violations....

Bunn, John vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV04667, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 5, 2019, ended December 16, 2020
$5,900,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 13, 1991, two NY corrections officers were shot at by two perpetrators and one died from his injuries. Detectives Louis Scarcella, Stephen Chmil, and John Barba wrongly identified 14-year old Defendant Bunn and his Co-Defendant as the perpetrators, despite there being no placement of them at the scene, no evidence of their involvement, and no connection between their appearance and the witness descriptions. The detectives, in an effort to close the case, created a pretextual reason for arrest, made false stories about the defendants, influenced the victim to identify the defendants out of a lineup, and used aggressive interrogation techniques against Defendant. Despite these issues and complete relia...

Ranta, Patricia, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV03794, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 25, 2014
Complaint
Description: On February 8, 1990, an attempted robbery gone wrong resulted in the murder of 56-year old Rabbi Chaskel Werzberger, and the family of Plaintiff David Ranta brought suit over the alleged manufacturing of evidence in pinning the murder on Ranta in an abuse of process and malicious prosecution scenario. Detectives Louis Scarcely and Stephen Chmil are the two detectives alleged to have manufactured the evidence through actions such as coaching witnesses.