David Granito

Badge #5921, White Male

Former Police Officer at Police Service Area 3

Service started June 1992, Tax #914100

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force

Complaints

3 Complaints

7 Allegations

1 Substantiated

1 Substantiated (Charges)

4 Exonerated

2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200007068, September 2000

Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
Complainant:	Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant:	Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
Complainant:	Black Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

additional details

Complaint #6294211, May 1994

Allegation:	Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #6294174, February 1994

Allegation:	Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200007068, September 2000
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force	Black Male, 31	Exonerated
Force: Physical force	Black Male, 31	Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word	Black Male, 31	Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Black Male, 31	Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest	Black Male, 31	Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #6294211, May 1994
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Force		Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #6294174, February 1994
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Force		Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.