Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 6 known lawsuits, $455,000 total settlements.
Estrada, Anthony vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 032534/2019E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 24, 2019, ended September 23, 2022
$175,000 Settlement
Rosario, Madia L., et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 158457/2013,
Supreme Court - New York, September 24, 2013
Duclos, Chenin vs City of New York
Case # 150593/2013,
Supreme Court - New York, January 23, 2013
Santos v. City of New York et al.
Case # 153860/2013,
Supreme Court - New York
Complaint
Asika et al v. City of New York et al.
Case # 157071/2013,
Supreme Court - New York
Complaint
Matthews v. City of New York et al
Case # 12CV01354,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$280,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: The plaintiff Craig Mathews is a 14-year veteran police officer who has been subjected to a campaign of retaliation and harassment for having reported the existence of a highly developed quota system in the 42nd Precinct in the Bronx.