Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 5 known lawsuits, $77,500 total settlements.
Medas- King, Andy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 009805/2013,
Supreme Court - Queens, June 5, 2013, ended March 6, 2014
$7,500 Settlement
Maury, Louis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 030629/2007,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 27, 2007, ended July 16, 2014
Administrative Closing
Allen et al v. City of New York et al
Case # 10CV03949,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Settlement
Complaint,
Stipulation
Beaton v. City of New York et al
Case # 12CV01303,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$30,000 Settlement
12-cv-01303-NG-MDG stip.pdf,
Amended Complaint
Hallums et al v. City of New York et al
Case # 07CV02106,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
$40,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint,
Stipulation