Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2010-2596
Opened: 2/4/2010
Closed: 8/18/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, did wrongfully make improper and inaccurate entries in said officer's activity log
-
Guilty:
Provided inaccurate facts to the New York county district attorney's office regarding an arrest of an individual known to the Department which resulted in said officer signing a criminal court complaint containing inaccurate information
-
Dismissed:
Offered or presented a written instrument to a public servant knowing it contained false information
-
Dismissed:
Knowingly made a false statement in a criminal court complaint
-
Guilty:
Failed and neglected to provide a clear and accurate narrative to the New York county district attorney's office regarding the arrest of an individual known to the Department and recovery of a controlled substance from said person.
Penalty: See Case #2010-2599 for penalty
Case: 2010-2599
Opened: 4/30/2010
Closed: 8/18/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
After a verbal dispute with an individual known to the Department, did strike that individual in the face
-
Guilty:
During a physical altercation with an individual known to the Department, pushed that individual and then shoved him to the ground
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York City Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of sixty-six (66) suspension days previously served.
Case: 2012-7021
Opened: 2/29/2012
Closed: 8/18/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While off-duty, did wrongfully consume a quantity of intoxicants to the extent that said officer was unfit for duty
Penalty: See Case #2010-2599 for penalty