Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2022-27087
Closed: 12/14/2022
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (1 day)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $383,000 total settlements.
Bruno, Bartholy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 010432/2014,
Supreme Court - Kings, July 23, 2014, ended November 21, 2014
$33,000 Settlement
Ramirez, Nicholaus and Ramirez, Jennifer Mng of Watson, Aaron and Watson, Ryan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 001992/2011,
Supreme Court - Kings, March 18, 2011, ended September 12, 2017
$350,000 Settlement