Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Perkins, Michael vs P.O. Valenzuela, Christian, et al.
Case # 17CV00423,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 23, 2017, ended March 26, 2021
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On or about August 9, 2015, there was an alleged robbery involving Jordan Card. Plaintiff alleges that Police Officer Christian Valenzuela #19271, Police Officer Keenen Adam-Edwards #10378, and Police Officer Johnathan Diaz-Mojica #14105 violated his 14th Amendment rights by repeatedly showing his picture to a drunken Jordan Card and asking him if Plaintiff was the one who robbed him, in a manner that constituted suggestive identification. Later that day, Plaintiff alleges his rights were further violated when Police Officer Anthony Lafemina #11439 included the same single photograph as before in an array of photographs shown to Jordan Card. On or about the same day, Plaintiff alleges Police Officer Keenen Adam...